|
Transnetyx
mouse strains Mouse Strains, supplied by Transnetyx, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse strains/product/Transnetyx Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse strains - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
97/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Addgene inc
mbd3 flox cell line ![]() Mbd3 Flox Cell Line, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/mbd3 flox cell line/product/Addgene inc Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mbd3 flox cell line - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Addgene inc
gof18δpe egfp ![]() Gof18δpe Egfp, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/gof18δpe egfp/product/Addgene inc Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gof18δpe egfp - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
92/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Rockland Immunochemicals
transgenic kitl tdtomato mice ![]() Transgenic Kitl Tdtomato Mice, supplied by Rockland Immunochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/transgenic kitl tdtomato mice/product/Rockland Immunochemicals Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
transgenic kitl tdtomato mice - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
97/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Taconic Biosciences
transgenic amyloid precursor protein ![]() Transgenic Amyloid Precursor Protein, supplied by Taconic Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/transgenic amyloid precursor protein/product/Taconic Biosciences Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
transgenic amyloid precursor protein - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Genentech inc
hucd20 transgenic mice ![]() Hucd20 Transgenic Mice, supplied by Genentech inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/hucd20 transgenic mice/product/Genentech inc Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hucd20 transgenic mice - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Jackson Laboratory
pck1nsrebp-1a transgenic mice ![]() Pck1nsrebp 1a Transgenic Mice, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/pck1nsrebp-1a transgenic mice/product/Jackson Laboratory Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pck1nsrebp-1a transgenic mice - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Jackson Laboratory
wild-type non-transgenic mice ![]() Wild Type Non Transgenic Mice, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/wild-type non-transgenic mice/product/Jackson Laboratory Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
wild-type non-transgenic mice - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Inserm Transfert
c57bl/6 j congenic mice expressing cd45.1 ![]() C57bl/6 J Congenic Mice Expressing Cd45.1, supplied by Inserm Transfert, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/c57bl/6 j congenic mice expressing cd45.1/product/Inserm Transfert Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c57bl/6 j congenic mice expressing cd45.1 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Taconic Biosciences
cetp-apob-100 transgenic mice ![]() Cetp Apob 100 Transgenic Mice, supplied by Taconic Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cetp-apob-100 transgenic mice/product/Taconic Biosciences Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cetp-apob-100 transgenic mice - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Jackson Laboratory
b6.cg–tg(cdh16-cre)91igr/j ![]() B6.Cg–Tg(Cdh16 Cre)91igr/J, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/b6.cg–tg(cdh16-cre)91igr/j/product/Jackson Laboratory Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
b6.cg–tg(cdh16-cre)91igr/j - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Jackson Laboratory
pv-tdt transgenic mice ![]() Pv Tdt Transgenic Mice, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/pv-tdt transgenic mice/product/Jackson Laboratory Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pv-tdt transgenic mice - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: Cell stem cell
Article Title: Deterministic Somatic Cell Reprogramming Involves Continuous Transcriptional Changes Governed by Myc and Epigenetic-Driven Modules
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.11.014
Figure Lengend Snippet: A. Experimental scheme. B. Spearman correlation between expression profiles of Mbd3f/- system Calculated over all differential genes (n=8,042), showing an average correlation of R=0.93 between consecutive samples. C. As in B, but between Mbd3flox/- and Gatad2a-/- systems. D. Overlap between targets of OSKM in promoters and enhancers. Pixel shade indicates Jaccard Index. E. Correlation between consecutive samples in Mbd3f/- system (MEF-day1, day1-day2, day2..day8-iPS), measured over all ESPGs promoters (promoters with differential chromatin pattern, n=3,593, top), or all differential enhancers (n=40,174, bottom), for each chromatin mark. Negative controls were calculated between MEF and IPS, are marked with solid border. F. Overlap between binding targets of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 or Myc, and previously published binding data of the same factors, calculated in ES and iPS samples. Percentage out of our measured binding targets is presented, along Fisher exact test p-values. G. Global transcriptional pattern of 8,042 differential genes (FC>4 & maximal FPKM value>1), sorted by their temporal pattern in Mbd3f/-system (the same gene order was applied for the other reprogramming systems). Heatmap represents unit-transformation of FPKM values. H. PCA analysis of all samples, alongside samples from previous publications (Polo et al., 2012). PCA was calculated on the same set of genes and normalization as in G. I. GO categories enriched among the genes that are active in each day. Gene is defined to be active in samples where RPKM is above 0.5 of the gene max value. P-values were calculated with Fisher exact test, and FDR corrected. Categories with corrected p-value<0.01 in at least two-time points are presented. Gray Shades represent FDR corrected p-values
Article Snippet: Secondary mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) from
Techniques: Expressing, Binding Assay, Transformation Assay
Journal: Cell stem cell
Article Title: Deterministic Somatic Cell Reprogramming Involves Continuous Transcriptional Changes Governed by Myc and Epigenetic-Driven Modules
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.11.014
Figure Lengend Snippet: A. ChIP-seq landscape of two examples. Promoters are marked in red, enhancers are marked in green. Signals are normalized to sample size (RPM). B. Overlap between binding of OSKM and active enhancers, in each day of reprogramming. Enhancer is defined as active in a specific day if its ATAC-seq z-score is above 1.5 STD in that day. Gray shades indicate Fisher exact test p-value for overlap between compared samples. Note that OSKM do not bind the enhancers that are active in MEF (D0, marked in red); these enhancers are not significantly bound by OSKM at any day during reprogramming. C. Number of enhancers bound by each of OSKM factors in each day of reprogramming. Upper row: out of enhancers that are bound by the factor in late stages (day8, iPS, ESC). Bottom row: out of enhancers that are bound by the factor in early stages (day1-day3). D. Probability to observe co-localized binding of transcription factors in promoters (gray) and enhancers (black). Calculated in days 1,8 and iPS (Error bars indicate S.E.M). Right – Myc binds 32% of promoters, and 8% of active enhancers. E. Significant motifs enriched in promoters and enhancers that are bound by each of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc at different days of reprogramming, as detected by Homer/4.7 software. P-values, indicated by color shade, were reported by Homer, and are FDR corrected. Motifs which are significantly enriched (corrected p<10-30) in at least one time point are presented. F. a. Motifs enriched in differential enhancers that are active in each day of reprogramming (ATAC-seq z-score >1.5). P-values, indicated by color shade, were reported by Homer, and are FDR corrected. Motifs which are significantly enriched (corrected p<10-50) in at least one-time point are presented. G. Motifs found in “closed” vs. “open” binding targets of the indicated transcription factor. Accessibility of targets was calculated based on ATAC-seq. Motifs found in OSK binding targets calculated in Mbd3f/- day1. Motifs that are different between open and closed binding targets are marked in black line. Complementary motifs to canonical motif appear in reverse order. H. Spearman correlation between ATAC-seq profiles of the two efficient reprogramming systems: Mbd3f/- MEF and C/EBPaTg B cell systems calculated over 40,174 differential enhancers.
Article Snippet: Secondary mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) from
Techniques: ChIP-sequencing, Binding Assay, Software
Journal: Cell stem cell
Article Title: Deterministic Somatic Cell Reprogramming Involves Continuous Transcriptional Changes Governed by Myc and Epigenetic-Driven Modules
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.11.014
Figure Lengend Snippet: A. Distribution of low (<0.02), mid (0.02-0.98) and high (>0.98) methylated CpG sites, along reprogramming. Average and SEM are indicated in red plot. B. Methylation level measured in covered enhancers (n=18,072), in Mbd3f/-, Gatad2a-/- and WT-2 systems. Enhancers are clustered into eight clusters using k-means. Cluster 8 consists of enhancers that undergo fast demethylation, compared to clusters 3 and 7. C. Average methylation measured in promoters of genes that were highly methylated (>80%) in day0. Genes that change their expression level (red) are compared to genes that do not change their expression level (gray). Wilcoxon p-value indicates places where methylation of differential genes is significantly lower than methylation of non-differential genes. D. Left: Enrichment of enhancer clusters, as shown in panel B, for OSK binding, DNA accessibility, and super enhancers, showing that cluster 8 is highly enriched for OSK binding and overlaps with super enhancers. Color shades represent FDR corrected enrichment p-value. Right: Enrichment of the same enhancer clusters to transcription factor binding, taken from hmChip database. Cluster size is indicated on the right. E. Experimental scheme summary. Reprogramming efficiency was measured by Oct4-GFP+ cells percentage in Tet1/2/3 null(Δ) and Tet1/2/3fl/fl with and without Gatad2a expression, after 8 days. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 (Student’s t-test), n=6, error bars indicate SD. F. Secondary MEF harboring Mir290-RGM and Nanog GFP-reporter were sorted after reprogramming to 3 different populations: RGM-SE-Mir290-tdTomato positive cells (sorted at day 5), Nanog-GFP and Mir290-RGM positive cells (sorted at d10-14), and "double negative" cells (sorted at d5). The cells were seeded as single cell-per-well, and were treated with medium either supplemented with Dox or lacking Dox. On day 14 colonies were inspected for GFP and mCherry (RGM) markers.
Article Snippet: Secondary mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) from
Techniques: Methylation, Expressing, Binding Assay
Journal: Cell stem cell
Article Title: Deterministic Somatic Cell Reprogramming Involves Continuous Transcriptional Changes Governed by Myc and Epigenetic-Driven Modules
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.11.014
Figure Lengend Snippet: A. Experimental flow describing three experimental perturbation settings: (i) Mbd3f/- MEFs were virally infected with cMyc over-expression (OE) cassette, OSK-OE cassette or both cassettes. Gene expression was measured on day4 following infection. (ii) Mbd3f/- MEFs carrying OSK Dox-dependent cassette were treated for knockdown of c-Myc, n-Myc and l-Myc. Gene expression was measured on days 3 and 7, and colony formation was measured on day 11. (iii) Mbd3f/- MEFs carrying OSKM Dox-dependent cassette were treated with inhibitor of cMyc (10058-F4) and with Dox. Gene expression and colony formation were measured on day 3. B. Distribution of Expression fold change (FC) compared to WT MEF of up/down regulated ESPGs (down regulated ESPGs are enriched for somatic genes), and CAPGs. Presented perturbations are over-expression of OSK cassette, over-expression of c-Myc cassette, or over-expression of the two cassettes together. (*p<10-5, **p<10-20, Wilcoxon test). C-D. Reprogrammed colony formation in Myc knockdown ort small molecule inhibition, measured 11-14 days after Dox. E. Distribution of expression fold change (FC, in log2 scale) compared to MEF of up/down regulated ESPGs and CAPGs. Presented perturbations are Myc knockdown, inhibition of Myc activity with small molecular inhibitor (10058-F4). (*p<10-5, **p<10-20, Wilcoxon test). F. Experimental scheme. G. IPSC Reprogramming efficiency in different cells expressing both endogenous and/or exogenous cMyc and nMyc. H. FACS analysis for surface expression of fibroblast surface marker Thy1 on the indicated Mbd3flox/- cell types. Dotted line indicates positive threshold for detection. I. Representative pictures of Mbd3fl/- cells harboring mCherry-NLS and ΔPE-GOF18 Oct4-GFP cassettes after 13 days of reprogramming in the presence of MYCi. Scale = 100μM. J. Left panel - iPSC reprogramming efficiency by applying highly efficient mouse B cell and WT CMP reprogramming protocols by OSKM in the presence or absence of MYC small molecule inhibitor (MYCi). Right panel – Human iPSC reprogramming efficiency by applying OKS lentiviral transduction in the presence of absence of MYCi. K. Expression fold-change distribution (log2 scale) of selected GO categories in Myc over-expression or Myc knockdown, showing that upon over-expression of Myc, processes such as ribosomal biogenesis and chromosome segregation are induced. L. Fraction of Myc targets in significantly induced and repressed GO categories, compared to what is expected by random (dashed line). M. Overlap between differential genes detected in Myc perturbation experiments, and differential genes detected in previous published perturbations (Scognamiglio et al., 2016). Fisher exact test p-values are presented. N. Expression fold change of selected chromatin modifiers.
Article Snippet: Secondary mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) from
Techniques: Infection, Over Expression, Expressing, Inhibition, Activity Assay, Marker, Transduction
Journal: Cell stem cell
Article Title: Deterministic Somatic Cell Reprogramming Involves Continuous Transcriptional Changes Governed by Myc and Epigenetic-Driven Modules
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.11.014
Figure Lengend Snippet: Key Resources Table
Article Snippet: Secondary mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) from
Techniques: Recombinant, Protease Inhibitor, Sample Prep, Methylation, Transgenic Assay, Negative Control, Software